Tag Archive for violence

Springfield Revealed [Revised]

I published a version of this post a couple of days ago. This one is much more detailed and refined. I wrote it up for The Drum, but it wasn’t wanted. You get it here instead :)

The Simpsons fan world is abuzz with the news Matt Groening has revealed the real Springfield is near his hometown in Oregon. Except it’s not. Springfield is stateless. For anyone to say otherwise is grand delusion. It is a delusion that has been picked up by media outlets all over the world – not least by our own Fairfax press and the ABC.

The revelation that Springfield, USA, borrowed its name from Springfield, Oregon, is not new either. Groening grew up in Portland, to the north of Springfield, and has revealed previously that many aspects of his childhood hometown have influenced The Simpsons. Most obvious is that the Simpson family themselves are named after Groening’s own family, while the street name Evergreen Terrace and various character names were also borrowed from Portland.

Groening made his grand revelation in an interview with The Smithsonian Magazine, and what he actually said is a long way from what has been reported in headlines and lead paragraphs. “The only reason [for the name Springfield] is that when I was a kid, the TV show “Father Knows Best” took place in the town of Springfield, and I was thrilled because I imagined that it was the town next to Portland, my hometown,” Groening said.
“When I grew up, I realized it was just a fictitious name. I also figured out that Springfield was one of the most common names for a city in the U.S. In anticipation of the success of the show, I thought, “This will be cool; everyone will think it’s their Springfield.” And they do.”

Of course they do, and that is just the point. In 23 seasons, writers have consistently dropped hints as to the location of the town, but many of those hints have been conflicting and contradictory. In The Simpsons Movie, the Simpson’s God-bothering neighbourino Ned Flanders reveals that Springfield’s state borders Ohio, Nevada, Maine and Kentucky. Any state to border those four would need to be half as big as the continental US. It also has a sea-faring port, a large canyon, snow-capped peaks, national parks and a large lake.

The number of real Springfields in the USA is an important aspect of its appeal, as Groening revealed. Since Springfield is meant to be any town and every town, it must everything that residents could need. Springfield is ably catered for with its own radio and television stations, significant heavy industry, tourist attractions, the Republican Party Headquarters, schools, universities, hospitals and an international airport. These attractions are important, because they mean the community of Springfield can be self-contained.

Springfield itself is one of the more significant characters in the show, because it provides a comforting, fulfilling presence. Since it has everything, there is never a need to leave Springfield – though the Simpsons do leave regularly. In an increasingly uncertain world, Springfield provides the safety and support that Americans need. It reaffirms American family values and assures them that everything will be okay, because Springfield will always be there.

Importantly, the Simpson family is part of a larger community – in one sense it is a community that represents every American. Springfield is, in a very real way, America itself. The town embodies those family and community values that Americans seek refuge in when faced with the unknown. In turn, this is reflected also in the family. For all Homer’s failings as a father and a worker, he is still there and still trying to do his best. Groening ties his Homer with the tale-teller from The Illiad and The Oddyssey, saying: “even though he is getting kicked in the butt by life, he is his own small hero.”

Homer Simpson is never violent toward Marge. Groening covered this in his interview as well: “The only thing he [Groening's father] said was that Homer could never, ever be mean to Marge. He said that was a rule… I thought that was a good note. I don’t know if that is a rule that has ever been articulated to people who work on the show, but everyone just gets it.” Homer’s gallantry is not limited to the women in his life. In one famed episode, he jumps Springfield’s canyon on Bart’s skateboard to stop his son from doing it.

In Springfields all across the US, fans of The Simpsons can find some comfort in Groening’s words and creations. Homer might not be in charge of safety at their power plant, but he is there in their imperfect but mostly good neighbours. The message of The Simpsons, though it might have been missed by the world’s media, is aimed squarely at every day Americans.

The Nuclear Family

In the course of reading up to ground myself in Springfield’s esteemed academic circles, I came across a work called Atomistic Politics and the Nuclear Family. The article presents a case – though it has a few holes – that The Simpsons actually presents a strong image of family. The family values are couched in contrast to an uncaring, absent, or overly therapeutic state and institutions. (This argument about the role of the state is based on one episode, in which the Simpsons kids are removed by child services and placed with the Flanders family).

Despite its flaws, I found some interesting ideas in the article, beginning with a reinterpretation of Homer (Cantor 1999, p738):

Many people have criticised The Simpsons for its portrayal of the father as dumb, uneducated, weak in character, and morally unprincipled. Homer is all of those things, but at least he is there.

This astute observation is followed up by another (p739):
He continually fails at being a good father, but he never gives up trying, and in some basic and important sense that makes him a good father.
These observations of Homer line up with one of my own – he is never violent to female characters.
This stuff is a little outside the remit of my thesis, but I nonetheless thought it interesting and worth sharing. Your thoughts are welcome!
Reference: Cantor, Paul A. 1999. ‘The Simpsons: Atomistic Politics and the Nuclear Family’, Political Theory, Vol. 27, No. 6 (Dec., 1999), pp. 734-749, Sage Publications. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/192244 .

 

Peach is in Another Castle

Do video games (and other digital media) influence society or does society influence them? Or is it a bit from Column A and a bit from Column B?

There are some strong arguments that repeated exposure to violence desensitizes people and, in the case of violent video games, even spurs/trains them to commit violent acts. This debate has been waged in academia and elsewhere. For an interesting overview, see this book chapter, or even this Wikipedia page. Commentators are split on whether there is a causal link, or a casual link.

I’m less interested in the serious stuff, like violence, than whether cool stuff comes across from digital media to the physical world. Check out this Cracked article Six Disastrous Way Pop Culture Influences the Real World for some examples of what I’m talking about. Obviously, there are the things like pop culture references that often litter conversations (such as the title of this post), but do actions and behaviours make the transition?

The video below by Remi Gaillard is one example of a video game coming to life.

While hilarious, this isn’t exactly what I’m talking about.

At one level, it is obvious that participatory media and participatory culture encourage users to engage in new actions outside of the particular medium they are using. We can find examples of these practices in Wikipedia, YouTube, metagaming, game clans and more. But these actions still tend to relate directly to the use of the medium. In these cases, the influences aren’t manifesting elsewhere.

Do you know of any examples of digital culture influencing people’s behaviour, in cool ways, away from the particular media item itself?

Switch to our mobile site