Tag Archive for prime minister

Year of the Dragon

How to Ruin A Country in Ten Days

On Monday, Kevin Rudd strode into Parliament a white knight leading a small band of fierce yet determined foot soldiers. He was there to do battle with the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard. From his pronouncements, we can imagine Rudd sees Gillard as an unfathomably evil creature who robbed him. She was the red dragon that stole his crown jewel.

The contrast is stark in Rudd’s mind. He escaped from the nasty coup in 2010 wounded but free of mud. He had jousted with the dragon and lost, because she had gathered an army of minions. This time, Rudd lost again. The minions were now senior Ministers, and they duped the caucus into believing Rudd would tear the Government apart. Again, he claims the moral superiority. His challenge was open and honest. He calmly approached the gates of her lair (having left fortress Brisbane far behind) and fought openly, while Wayne Swan and others ambushed him even as Gillard loomed in sight. His tears in 2010 were pure, borne of shock and a sense of betrayal. Today, Rudd knew he would lose. He will retreat to the backbench for now.

The whole fantasy of Kevin Rudd the White is a story that has been well-told by Rudd and his supporters. If only Labor had managed to enthrall the electorate with the tale.

They could have used their time since 2007 to draw up a neat map of successes. They warded off the plague of the GFC, saw a carbon tax through the roughest of media seas, delivered increases in pensions for the villagers, and began laying down the information infrastructure that will keep the kingdom strong. They have delivered much more. In contrast, Tony Abbott careens wildly throughout the countryside, trying to find the cracks that will let him climb into the castle.

Instead of trumpeting their successes, Labor has given Abbott the chance to show that you can slay a dragon – and a whole bunch of her colleagues – without offering a credible alternative. Where other Liberal leaders have articulated clear vision, Abbott has just been casting spells and hoping that one of them won’t turn him into a toad.

Gillard’s victories include the aforementioned carbon tax, plus the health agreement and the pay boost for community services workers. These are her reforms. But they have barely been mentioned outside of the media and the Government. Gillard has not been able to write the Government’s story. This is partly because she lost the ability to narrate it once Rudd was deposed. Instead, the clear voice of the brave knight has been reading it his way. He was the victim and the classic fairy tale storyline kicked in. He had to be returned, because that would be natural justice. That is the ending the public have been seeking.

When Rudd broke from the pattern last week and resigned as Foreign Minister, he once again seized the role of narrator. He told us the Gillard reforms began while he was in charge and he now sought to take credit for them. He stepped into the role of the Knight as we had hoped. He evolved into the worn down hero who has had enough of tyranny and would lead the revolt. But Rudd had not counted on the venom from those he had worked with. Nicola Roxon, Wayne Swan and Simon Crean let their arrows fly as soon as Rudd’s drawbridge was down. Only bit-part Ministers (with the exception of Anthony Albanese) joined his party. The villagers cheered for Rudd as he rode out, but it was not their battle to fight. The members of the Labor caucus would decide this winner and many showed their disdain for the interference of the public.

It remains to be seen whether Gillard will take vengeance on those who supported Rudd. Her refusal to accept Albanese’s resignation suggests that they will be treated well. But as the White Knight retreats to mend his armour, the prospect of ongoing disunity in the Government is strong. Their best hope is to tell a compelling story. It needs to be a page turner. The successes need to be seen and celebrated. If not, another army may rise to challenge Gillard, even if the flaxen-haired ex-PM is not part of the charge.

Cartel Parties in Australia’s Democracy

Democracy is notoriously difficult to define, but any serious conception always includes power being somehow vested with the people. And yet in countries that would be considered democratic, the power mostly seems to stick with certain elite groups. These groups have privileged access to the media and that usually enforces their success in elections. The internet has the potential to re-shape this paradigm, but so far that potential has mostly gone under-utilised (I’m going to address that in a later post).

There are also other structures that influence power in democracies. One of those is the party system. Australia’s party system is like most others – two parties dominate to the exclusion of others, except for minor players who come and go. Within those parties, power is often concentrated in the hands of a few. For a demonstration of this point, Google the words parachute, preselect and election on Google Australia. (What the hell, I’ve done it for you.)

While (mildly) challenged by the Greens in recent years, Australian politics remains dominated by the Liberal-National Coalition and the Labor Party. They represent classic cases of cartel parties, and the comfortable arrangement leaves many questioning the difference between the two.

I subscribe to the theory that adversarial left-right thinking is out of date. Instead, I propose a broad shift to smaller parties huddled around core issues. Governments could then be made up of true coalitions who must openly debate every issue and legislate in the interests of the broader community who voted for their local representative.

To start with, I suggest:

  • Dissolving the Liberal-National Partnership, which would allow Liberals to focus on liberal philosophy and the Nats to focus on country matters.
  • Weeding conservatives from the Liberal Party and creating a Conservative Party. This would allow Conservative voters to vote at a local level and know the philosophy their party will follow. It would also give Liberal voters certainty over who they are voting for, and remove the farce where a liberal leader is replaced by a conservative leader (or vice versa) and an about-face on most issues occurs.
  • Reform the Greens. The Greens are a mostly socialist party, having moved away from their environmental origins. Leave the Greens to become experts on environmental issues and allow the socialists to move into other parties. In a sense, this would open the Greens up and encourage non-socialists who are concerned about the environment to join the party.
  • Reshape the ALP. The Australian Labor Party has forgotten about the conditions of the working class and moved more toward socialist positions. Of course, there is a lot of overlap between socialism and the labour movement. However, as with the Greens above, it would be beneficial for Labor to properly utilise the skills and experience of worker’s rights activists rather than relying on socialist Prime Ministers.
  • The Socialist Alliance is a minor party, but could grow in influence with input from the Green-Socialists and the Labor-Socialists who would leave those other parties.

The above suggestions are broad, blue-sky thinking and they are obviously controversial. However, by removing the adversarial nature of Australian politics and encouraging smaller parties, we could end up with a more representative and cooperative democracy.

NOTE: This post is written mostly tongue-in-cheek. While I think there is a need to move away from the left-right paradigm, there are probably more workable ways to do it than overhauling the entire political system. Still, its an interesting proposition. Feel free to disagree in the comments.

Yakkity-YAC

I was recently asked to give a short speech to a regional gathering of youth advisory council members. The young people had come from NGOs and Councils across the Southern Highlands, Wollondilly, Camden and Campbelltown areas. Given my experience in YACs at all levels, I felt I had something important to offer the attendees.

Below is the speech I prepared. Please note, as anyone who has seen one of my presentations will attest, I rarely stick very closely to the script.

At the start of 2010, I put my signature on the YAC report from the previous year. That year, we had made some really solid recommendation to the Government, but it didn’t seem like much had come of it. YACs can be a bit like that.

What are YAC meetings like?
Boring!!!

They can drag on for hours and often nothing gets resolved. That’s just what government does. But you also get to learn a stack of stuff. You make contacts. You get friends and potentially you can get jobs out of it.

I have the unusual perspective of serving on youth advisory bodies under the Howard and Rudd Governments, and also in the dying days of a vastly unpopular government last year as Chair of the 2010 NSW Youth Advisory Council.

In those roles, I have seen the committees treated in lots of different ways. I have seen indifference, feigned interest, real interest from the Minister and the Government, genuine interest from the Minister but indifference from the Government and all sorts of interactions in between.

On the National Youth Roundtable, I was fortunate enough to travel to and from Melbourne and Canberra several times. We stayed in pretty great hotels, had pretty awesome meals and I got to hang out with some great people. We worked on a really detailed and interesting project aimed at addressing mental health concerns for young people. On the NSW YAC, I have again worked with some really awesome people from right across the state on a whole range of projects.

On the 2010 NSW YAC, we focused on four issues: young driver licence restrictions; access to higher education for young people from rural and regional areas; participation of young people in their local areas; and climate change.

[Here I relayed a story about fronting a press conference, unexpectedly, with then Minister for Roads David Borger about our young driver report]

Failing isn’t really failing. It’s just an opportunity to learn how to do better next time. So if you walk into a meeting and think that you have enough support to push something through and then it doesn’t happen, what do you do? You keep working at it. You learn more about your topic and you come back to the table more able to win the debate next time. That’s where YACs can be really helpful. You can find it endlessly frustrating, but in the end, there might just be something that gets through the layers of bureaucracy and really makes a difference.

I like to think of it this way, you might not really find that you have enough skills to fly at the end of the day, but if you end up falling, you’ll do it in style.

[Give due credit to Pixar for this line, which is from Toy Story]

That 2009 report I mentioned came back to me a few weeks ago. I received a Facebook message from a friend. He congratulated me on the report, as he had come across it in the course of his work and was summarising it for his boss, so she could keep up with youth issues in the community. That friend of mine works for the Prime Minister.

Switch to our mobile site