Tag Archive for australia

I’m no economist, but…

Australia’s consumer price index measures the changes in costs of average goods to most households. If the CPI rises, then wages and pensions need to rise so people have the same amount of money, in real terms, to spend on everyday items. That’s the simple explanation. A longer one is provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics:

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a measure of changes, over time, in retail prices of a constant basket of goods and services representative of consumption expenditure by resident households in Australian metropolitan areas.
The simplest way of thinking about the CPI is to imagine a basket of goods and services comprising items typically acquired by Australian households. As prices vary, the total price of this basket will also vary. The CPI is simply a measure of the changes in the price of this basket as the prices of items in it change.

For practical reasons, the CPI basket cannot include every item bought by households, but it does include all the important kinds of items. It is not necessary to include every item that people buy since many related items are subject to similar price changes. The idea is to select representative items so that the index reflects price changes for a much wider range of goods and services than is actually priced.
The total basket is divided into a number of major commodity groups, subgroups and expenditure classes. It covers items such as food, alcohol and tobacco, clothing and footwear, housing, household contents and services, health, transportation, communication, recreation, education and financial and insurance services.

Got it? Good. The CPI measures increases. It does not provide a justification for further increases.

In the case of items like insurance and rent, it is obvious why they will go up in line with CPI increases – the providers need to cover higher costs. Rent is someone’s income as much as it is someone else’s expense while your insurance will need to keep pace with the value of the items being insured. But I cannot work out why CPI increases are used to justify government charges like train fares, etc. See this quote from the Sydney Morning Herald:

there has been no real increase in CityRail fares since 2010. The former government effectively froze fares in its last year in office, while the current government lifted 2012 rail fares only enough to offset consumer price index changes since 2010.

Wouldn’t further increasing charges to keep pace with CPI just keep pushing the CPI up?

There is a cynical explanation – cost saving. But most government charges are percentage or bracket based anyway, so they get increases through payroll and income taxation, GST, etc. If someone has a non-cynical explanation for how such increases can be justified on the basis of CPI increases, I’d love to hear it.

It’s Not Easy to be a Green

Warning: Rant Ahead.

One of Bob Brown’s major tag lines is that the majority of the population agrees with the Greens on issues like climate change and social policy. I suspect he’s right. But the problem for the Greens is the majority of the population – those who see the world and politics in oppositional binaries (good/bad, Liberal/Labor, male/female, black/white, or whatever) – can’t agree with the party’s more radical ideology.

Most people generally support the idea of environmental protection, even at the expense of jobs, as the recent anti-mine movement attests. Most people agree there should be universal access to healthcare services including dental and disability. Most people like the idea that there will be a strong safety net there when they most need it. But they cannot accept that we should legalise marijuana and they cannot accept private schools ought not receive any public funding. These are part of The Greens’ platform in the public mind. The descriptions I’ve given might not be accurate, but they are prevalent, and that’s where The Greens fall down with most of the voting public. They have an image problem because they allow the ideas to linger. They allow radicals within the party to promote these as legitimate policy platforms. Instead of consigning their radicals to the dustbin so a broader range of community support can be gained, they carry on as is.

And that is why the Greens will not achieve the power they crave. Their platform denies entry to those they need most – voters on the margins of the major parties who do support their broad environmental and social policies. They don’t make it easy to vote for them, much less participate in the party as a member or even candidate, because they alienate too many.

Disturbing News for Democracy

As you read this post, please bear in mind that I am certainly not a Greens supporter. If you want to read about my political convictions, check out this post.

I am fundamentally disturbed at suggestions the Federal Government may have authorised or participated in the covert surveillance on a member of the Federal Parliament. Scott Ludlam, a Greens Senator from Western Australia and the Greens spokesperson on Broadband, Communications and Digital Economy, has said his phone might have been hacked during his recent time with cyberpunk Jacob Appelbaum.

Appelbaum is variously described as a hacker and an ‘independent’ security researcher. He has been associated with Wikileaks and is perhaps best known for regularly being stopped by US authorities when entering that country. He was in Australia to speak at a conference called War on the Internet, alongside Crikey writer Bernard Keane and Ludlam.

Crikey‘s Andrew Crook and Ludlam take up the story:

“I was Jacob’s chaperone back from Ballarat to Melbourne for the forum … and I discovered first thing in the morning that the battery was being chewed through freakishly quickly,” Ludlam told Crikey. ”I needed to put another other charge on it by about 10 or 10.30 in the morning. So it was being eaten up two or three times faster than normal.”

Appelbaum explained his phone may have been “off”, in the language of the intelligence services.

“That’s one symptom if the transmitter’s been switched on remotely so it’s basically broadcasting whatever it’s hearing … that would be one reason the battery was being chewed up,” Ludlam said. ”I wouldn’t have thought much about it, except for the fact that I’ve been spending quite a bit of time recently around people that who are actually surveilled.”

If the Government decide they need to keep tabs on Appelbaum while he’s in Australia, fine. I am most concerned that they did it by tracking an elected government member. If Ludlam was tracked, it is a severe slap in the face to any vestige of free and representative government and it is an insult to democracy. Various academics and others have suggested our democracy is corrupt in any number of ways, not least because of the interference of lobbyists, but this type of action is rarely discussed. The main reason for that lack of discussion is probably that, if it occurs, it is well-covered.

Ludlam doesn’t appear to be worried about the possible consequences of speaking to Crikey, and the Fairfax press has since picked up on the story as well. That, at least, is positive. If this type of behaviour is discussed in public, we have a better chance of eradicating it.


Tell me what you think. Is it likely Ludlam was surveilled by our government? If so, do you think this has serious consequences for Australian democracy?

A Busy Rotaract Week

On the way home from the 2011 Australian Rotaract Conference, I got thinking about the week ahead. I hadn’t quite realised just how busy it was shaping up to be.

Amongst rehearsals for Grease, work and uni work, I have a lot of stuff to do for Rotaract:

  • Tonight (Monday), our club is hosting the District Governor;
  • Tomorrow (Tuesday), I will be having lunch with the DG, three other Rotary Club Presidents and the local Assistant DG;
  • Wednesday I will be presenting to the Rotary Club of Berrima District at their lunch time meeting and attending the Rotary Club of Moss Vale for their dinner time meeting;
  • Thursday I will be on the gates at Bowral’s Tulip Time festival.
This is my mid session from uni, so I had to ask myself just what I was doing by filling it up with all these other things. That lead to the question of just what does Rotaract mean for me? It was a question posed by the Chair of Rotaract Australia at the conference.
For me, Rotaract is about the chance to give back to my community, to meet new friends, have new experiences, gain skills and have a stack of fun. It can definitely be hard work, but members are free to commit as much or as little time as they like. The upside of it is that the more you put in, the more value you get from being part of it.

ARL vs NRL

I just received this email from someone who often sends me these kinds of emails. Many of them are funny. They brighten your day up. But, then, many are just like this one. Have a read of it and see my comments at the bottom.

36 have been accused of spouse abuse 
7
 have been arrested for fraud
19
 have been accused of writing bad cheques   
117
 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at  least 2 businesses   
3
 have done time for assault 
71,
  repeat 71   cannot  get a credit card due to bad credit 
14
 have been arrested on drug-related charges 
8
 have been arrested for shoplifting 
21
 currently are defendants in lawsuits and
84
 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year 
 

Can
   you guess which organization this is? AFL? NRL? 
 

Give
   up yet? .. . .. .   Scroll down 
 
 

 

Neither,
 
 
it’s the 535
 members of the AUSTRALIAN PARLIAMENT in   CANBERRA 


The
  same  group of Idiots that crank out hundreds of new laws each year, designed to keep the rest of us in line. 

You’ve
   got to pass this one on!

Well, no, I haven’t got to pass this on. Mostly, because it is completely wrong and foolish. There are only 226 members of the Australian parliament (150 in the House of Reps and 76 in the Senate). But guess what? In the United States, there are 435 members of Congress and 100 Senators, for a total of 535 in that parliament.

I can’t vouch for the validity or otherwise of the other numbers in this email, but if it has that one – the punchline – so wrong, I wouldn’t count on anything else being correct.

This type of email is whats wrong with the internet.

Switch to our mobile site